To be clear, it's not my interpretation. Outside of a basic understanding how to design an assay, my expertise on this subject is limited. I am relaying information from people who have studied the material and expressed concerns based on their findings.
Strictly speaking, the mRNA wouldn't be modifying anything if it has no mechanism to enter the cell. However, because we have published evidence from multiple sources that show DNA contaminations in [all] lots of Pfizer and Moderna, the focus on the mRNA aspect is moot IF they do all in fact contain DNA plasmids that are able to enter a cell and modify the genome. If this information didn't exist, I would be agreeing with you.
The qPCR assays were not designed to quantify the amount of DNA present, this is being done independently after the fact.
"Further, it should also be taken into account that DNA impurities in Comirnaty® are apparently integrated into the lipid nanoparticles and are thus transported directly into the cells of a vaccinated person, just like the mRNA active ingredient."
Does that sound like something that isn't able to modify a persons DNA?
https://www.mdpi.com/2409-9279/7/3/41
Login to reply
Replies (1)
I missed a bit off the quote:
"What this means for the safety risks, particularly the possible integration of this DNA into the human genome"
That said, the way that regulators and the manufacturers have conducted themselves, such as data obfuscation, lying about these things existing, then lying about them being active, is suggestive to me that these are not contaminations, but they were put there intentionally, and the assays were designed in a way that would hide this information. I am open to having my biased skewed away from 'conspiracy', however, things have been trending in that direction.
This study found twice the amount of mRNA which was approved, and over 500 times the DNA limit.
So, DNA integration is a valid concern with these shots in my opinion.