Thread - Nostr Hypermedia

And I am by no means deeply into the weeds of the op_return issue. I do however understand that we need to be EXTREMELY careful when making changes to a bitcoin implementation that is so widely used -- AND I also understand that supporting bitcoin core changes to help "extreme edge cases", given the above point of extreme care, just doesn't compute. So, based on your own words in video above - I disagree with you, in that it lives up to your responsibility as whatever person in bitcoin you are (of higher than average importance) to support such a change. Remember! My disagreement here is based 👏 on 👏 your 👏 own 👏 words 👏 PLUS the idea that changes to bitcoin core should be taken with EXTREME CARE.

↑ Parent

Replies (2)

Jameson Lopp lopp@lopp.net 0 months ago

Your disagreement is noted and hereby discarded since you clearly can't comprehend how it's possible to be quite careful with software changes while handling edge cases.

2 replies ↓

BitcoinIsFuture 0 months ago

Merit and logic is gone from Core. Majority of Core devs are compromised and are just cucks to shitcoiners and VCs like Jameson Lopp. We have seen Core's so called "arguments" and we have seen their actions.

BitcoinIsFuture

Compromised Core devs rejected the fix for inscriptions pretending it has been "controversial PR". Compromised Core dev pushed OP_RETURN as if it was not controversial.

View quoted note →