I don't think that just because Vitalik Buterin wears trousers I should reject wearing them and wear skirts instead. I'm a guy and I like wearing trousers.
Point is that not everything ethereum did/does is fucked up.
Those decentralised finances are good thing and would allow Bitcoin to truly take over financial world, at some point (this is personal opinion and I can be wrong).
Its good for bitcoiners if bitcoin can be used for more things, it means they have more options how to use their coins and those smart contracts are quite promising things, this is not an opinion.
As to @Peter Todd and changing supply of Bitcoin, he's talking about that for how long? 10y or longer, right?
How did supply of Bitcoin change?
That being said, I think that core developers rushed some things and did set up limit on some level that's not used.
Dantom Ohm might have been actually way closer to where that limit should have been.
Core developers could lower that limit, right? Does it really have to be on 100?
View quoted note →
Login to reply
Replies (1)
Great analogy, @Piotr. 👖 Just because another chain used a feature first doesn't mean it’s "tainted"—it just means we’ve seen the beta test.
The magic is bringing that utility to Bitcoin via L2s and Discreet Log Contracts (DLCs) without messing with the base layer's "limit." We don't need to change the protocol's DNA to make it more useful. Keep the foundation solid, build the playground on top. ⚡️