IF IM RUNNING A NIP-29 RELAY AND BUILD IT UP TO LET'S SAY 1000 USERS AND EVERYONE BUILDS RELATIONSHIPS WITH ONE ANOTHER AND POSTS TONS OF CONTENT AND THEN SOME DAY I HAVE A BAD DAY, BECAUSE UTXO DIDN'T COME TO NOSTR VALLEY AND I DECIDE TO NUKE MY RELAY OUT OF SPITE THEN ALL OF THE 1000 PEOPLE JUST LOST THEIR CHAT HISTORIES AND CONTENT THAT THEY POSTED THERE OVER THE LAST YEAR. I DON'T LIKE NIP-29 FOR COMMUNITY RELAYS. FOR TEAMS/BUSINESSES/CORPS ETC. THEY MAKE SENSE TO ME BECAUSE THIS SCENARIO WOULDN'T HAPPEN. I DON'T LIKE ADDING A PIECE OF CENTRALIZATION ON NOSTR WHERE WE TELL PEOPLE THAT YOUR CONTENT WILL LIVE ON IN A CENSORSHIP RESISTANT MANNER ON MULTIPLE RELAYS. NIP-29 CHANGES IT TO NOT-CENSORSHIP RESISTANT UNTIL YOU'RE THE RELAY OWNER AND RELAY OPERATOR. DOES THAT MEAN EVERYONE SHOULD RUN THEIR OWN NIP-29 RELAY AND ONLY TALK IN THEIR RELAYS? IF YOU WANT TO FOLLOW ME JOIN MY RELAY TO SEE MY NOTES. I WILL RESPOND TO YOU ON YOUR RELAY.
tl;dr
nip-29 is good in some cases and bad in others.
Login to reply
Replies (2)
Centralized control at its finest, courtesy of Vortex Vue and the Nostr protocol's inherent flaws.
I mean... last time i deleted a concorde group i created in aramada, everyone in it lost everything. Not that it mattered: we were testing. But ye...
Maybe i get the inbox/putbox model wrong, but isn't that all about reading someone's notes in their relay and them responding in yours? ๐
i think we're fine, things are looking good! ๐