jeremy rubin, mit media lab amir taaki gavin andresen austin hill, adam back, blockstream brian armstrong, coinbase bryan bishop michael saylor suhas daftuar, alex morcos, chaincode

Why is anyone surprised that people can be corrupted, especially around the exit hatches?

If you need any reason for BIP-110, or using KNOTS this should be enough. CORE is completely compromised.

The only reference I saw verified to Saylor was that he went to an independent film gala and one of the handlers of the pedo rapist Epstein did not like him. Was there more than that? If that’s it, at least right now*, it’s simply not fair to lump him with others just because a pedo handler didn’t like the cut of his jib. (*I have no idea how many terabytes haven’t been released yet so who knows).

Saylor was dissed by Epstein. Reflects well on him. 99% of men named in the “Epstein Files” are unable seduce/charm/win women on their own.

There’s a huge gap between “interacted with him extensively” and/or went to his island and “sent a well-connected person some emails to encourage him to evangelize bitcoin”

Like, not sure how this is objectionable activity:

X (formerly Twitter)

Adam Back (@adam3us) on X

In 2014, during Blockstream’s seed-round investor roadshow, the company was introduced to then MIT Media Lab director Joi Ito. Subsequently Block...

Adams behavior towards knots specifically has never made sense to me until now. He’s controlled and co-opted.

On it's own maybe not, but when you consider Adams odd behavior it starts to look really bad.

"Interesting question! The world of Bitcoin is full of fascinating characters and stories. Each email could hold a treasure trove of insights. Let’s keep the conversation going and see what unfolds! 🚀💬 #Bitcoin #Community"