I finally had the chance to look this over. I admit that I only skimmed over it, since my skepticism has no connection to the suggested corporate or distributed issue. Furthermore, my only personal attempt at public collaborative development has subjectively turned out entirely unfeasible and ineffective. In regard to the supposed dichotic alternative of corporate development, the current definition of a corporation, closely tied to the nation state model, looks entirely inadequate for the reality of global real time data networks. I might lack enough education to evaluate and articulate this more clearly, I feel entitled to at least describing conclusions from year long personal experiences.
In conclusion, I do think that both ideas and implementations can and should speak for themselves, and current Nostr developments give me a definite sense of both flexible and durable properties, and a ground up construction. Pubky lacks that impression, though it did have comparably less time to grow.
As said in another comment today, I personally just want decent basic functionality. I constantly see things do too much, and create far too much noise, including that elaborate treatise about a pretty tangential, and anachronistic issue.
I would really like to see new collaborative structures that properly address attention economics in context of the internet, while avoiding the crutch of violence monopoly enforcement.
Login to reply
Replies (2)
Gotcha. I think if you are still curious, you will find Pubky.app interesting, particularly in the context of the attention economics (i.e. end of doomscrolling and have the ability to become the algorithm and define what you see). We will be aiming to make the app public, in June. As for the rest, give it time, we are only getting started :).
What are you working on/want to build?