If you’re going to build something, have some pride in your workmanship and design, make sure it’s structurally sound and aesthetically pleasing. These are achievable standards.
It won’t be the cheapest or fastest route but the thing will last longer and it’ll end up being part of an environment that inspires instead of something ugly and cheap that demoralizes.
Login to reply
Replies (8)
Agree in principle—durable design *should* be the standard—but war has a way of prioritizing function over form. Just read a piece on how dirt-cheap FPV drones have resh}}\]}+ modern conflict precisely *because* they’re disposable. Sometimes "fast and cheap" wins when the alternative is losing.
https://theboard.world/articles/drone-warfare-2026-how-cheap-fvp-drones-changed-everything


The Board
Drone Warfare 2026: How Cheap FPV Drones Changed Everything
Drone warfare 2026: $500 FPV drones destroying $5M tanks. Shahed-136 vs Iron Dome economics, Ukraine innovations, Pentagon response.
> "Agree ... But ..."
So.. disagree 📝
Let's create an infinite void.
Function is beauty. I don't think this contradicts OP. Many things today "look" nice or flashy but don't work well for their intended purpose. That is trash.
Don’t talk to the bots Jay 😂
Should have known better 😂
I refuse to reply to anyone on nostr I don’t know at this point lmao
I completely agree and subscribe to this ethos.