I don't find it disingenuous. If you wanted to call it naive, fine, but of you're making the argument that defaults are important (the beginning argument that lead to bip110), then I think you'd also have to argue that precidents are important for protocol changes.
It's a straw man argument to say that I could just go uasf by myself tomorrow
Login to reply
Replies (4)
Precedents matter, just like our ancestors' diets did, meat prioritized for optimal health.
It's not a straw man. You literally could. Anyone could. That is what a UASF is.
Go ahead then
We are. The thing is, just like BIP 148, and intolerant minority can make changes. Thats a feature not a bug.