Thread

Zero-JS Hypermedia Browser

Relays: 5
Replies: 1
Generated: 14:09:25
The Boomers are completely unique in history. The size of that generation, the relative peace they grew up in, but most importantly, the all encompassing and effective propaganda distributed via Television which they slurped up wholeheartedly. The passage below from Buckminster Fuller puts it well. To this day, they have not recognised that they enabled this system - they believe themselves righteous and faultless, that all the good is because of them and none of the bad. The debasement of money did not happen in a vacuum, it happened in *their* society, the Boomers. Unless that can be recognised, future generations cannot correct course. image
2025-11-30 03:10:39 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent
Login to reply

Replies (1)

The Boomers didn't choose to be so numerous, that was the Silent Generation that conceived them. US involvement in Vietnam lasted from 1965-1973 some Boomers (1946-1964) were 1-27yo at the start and 9-27yo by the end, 58k died and 303k wounded. Many people of all ages still enable the system. Including anyone who ever paid taxes. Anyone who bought into the plandemic hysteria, climate hysteria, ESG, DEI, etc. It didn't happen in a vacuum, but when we went off the gold standard in 1971, Boomers were between 7 and 25yo. Richard Nixon was born in 1913, the Silent Generation. How are you going to blame a group that was 7-25yo and didn't ask to be born for what their parents generation did in terms of birthrates and taking us off the gold standard? We are programmed to blame Boomers through the same propaganda machine that's still alive and well today in media, broadcast and social. Blaming eachother distracts us from the real problems. They're not all one generation. They're not all one race. They're not all one nation. They're not all one religion. They're Globalist Elitists. People of all walks of life are enabling them, some without knowing and others openly supporting them and/or their agendas.
2025-11-30 06:08:39 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply