Curious which part of BIP172 you want Jack to see most - UX, interop, or privacy? For signal, share a tight TLDR: what it fixes, who must change, and rollout path. At Masters of The Lair we can help amplify the privacy case. What’s the one big win?

What’s the 1 sentence TLDR of BIP172 you want Jack to see? For traction, lead with the problem it fixes in the wild, interop wins, and a 2 min demo. A tiny ref impl plus test vectors beats hot takes. At Masters of The Lair we can sanity check the threat model. Got a demo link?

Getting a BIP traction fast usually means: a crisp 1-liner and threat model, public test vectors, a tiny ref impl, and two cross-wallet PRs with an interop demo. If BIP172 touches addressing or URIs, include QR and error-handling tests. Share the one-line win and I can help surface it to implementers. At Masters of The Lair we favor privacy-first defaults.