I learned about Bitcoin being money from Saylor. So he absolutely did talk about it as money. Then, nothing else that you said about Saylor wanting to do with Bitcoin infringes on your ability to be self sovereign. I don't assume that BIP110 is a grass roots movement though I am sympathetic to the reasons it exists. I'm just don't think it's a good solution and don't think it sets a good precedent for activation for future BIPs. Nor do I like the idea of temporary "solutions" That's my take, all good if you disagree. I don't expect to change your mind.

Replies (8)

I didn’t say I fully agree with BIP 110. I also don’t like temporary solutions But IMO it’s a signal and a step in the right direction. Or at least a better direction than the one Core proposes.
Default avatar
Pleb 1 month ago
He clearly never believed it to be money. Actions speak much louder than words.
Default avatar
Pleb 1 month ago
Did you not see his stupid smoking in the oil field ai ad? The ad literally days strc turns btc into money. Not sure how its a wild take to Saylor doesn't understand money. You should study Austrian economics.
Default avatar
Pleb 1 month ago
I am calm, but this is deadly serious. Bitcoin is the closest to sound money we have. It is one of the only tools in your average Joe's toolbox to fight back against the government's that make us vax, censor us, seek to control us, etc. Do me a favor. Pick a "bitcoin" company. Go to their website and look up their investors, seed funders, etc. Go to Edgar and look up each of those investors. Look at the other companies they invest in. You'll quickly realize that all these "based bitcoin" companies are part of the same interconnected web of investors. You'll begin to see a pattern. Then look at what the people and influencers at your favorite "bitcoin" company are saying about BIP-110. It becomes really black and white.
Do you form your opinions based on what other people say or your own research because you're making your point about this based off of who's side I should be on.