The argument here is that the majority of today's problems can actually be traced back to the naivety of women.
The argument would be somewhat valid if history had shown that without women's suffrage, power-hungry, egomaniacal sociopaths would not have ruined society.
It distracts from the fact that voting on the property and life of another human being is fundamentally wrong, regardless of whether it is a woman or a man who votes. Men vote just as unfairly as women in other areas.
Login to reply
Replies (2)
I see your argument and humbly ask to prove it?
My moral compass tells me that it is fundamentally wrong for a group of people to be able to determine the life and property of an individual through elections (or birthright, etc.) and enforce this with violence. I cannot provide any proofs for this. Probably no one can.
However, there are enough anecdotes from history, the principle of non-aggression, the golden rule...