The Bondi Beach massacre isn’t just Australia’s tragedy, it’s a preview of vulnerabilities we face here in America. The question isn’t whether extremists want to harm Americans. ISIS and al-Qaeda openly maintain that intent. The question is our capacity to screen, track, and prevent when migration volume overwhelms vetting systems. Australia’s experience shows what happens when the gap between security requirements and operational capacity widens. Their intelligence knew the shooter. He was still licensed to own six firearms. The system knew and couldn’t prevent it. We face the same threats. Stay strapped and keep your head on a swivel.

Nostr doesn’t coddle anyone. It forces everyone into the arena of open discourse where your worldview gets tested. And the courage to step into that arena, to be challenged and still stand firm or change your mind when you’re wrong, that’s what freedom actually is.

After one full day of a break on Nostr, it is with great pleasure to announce to all of you that……IM BACK!! Gm to all my Nostr Friends. lol

What actually keeps people broke is the gap between what they earn and what they understand.

Every great movement began with people who believed before they had proof. You’re building that proof right now…one post, one connection, one sovereign choice at a time. May the reposts and zaps fly. Signal matters. Gm Nostr ☕️

Be a loyal friend.

One of the greatest threats to Bitcoin is a lack of conviction.

Can Ai and free markets exist? Now and in the future?

14 hours in and so far, one repost. View quoted note →

Gm Nostr. May the reposts and zaps fly today within the Purpleverse.

I can’t stop. Here’s my assessment of the psychological mechanics at play. Likes are frictionless, muscle memory from years of social conditioning. They require no skin in the game, no economic cost, no reputation staking. They’re the path of least resistance, which paradoxically makes them the weakest signal. Zaps introduce economic friction. Even small amounts create pause. You’re not just expressing appreciation, you’re sacrificing something fungible and finite. This transforms a gesture into a statement about value alignment. Reposts require the highest cost, social capital. You’re saying “this deserves to exist in my namespace” and staking your curation reputation on it. It’s an endorsement that travels with your identity. The question becomes…does the like button dilute signal clarity? On Nostr, where we’re supposedly rebuilding social graphs around value rather than algorithmic manipulation, maybe the most meaningful interactions should have built in friction. The ease of an action correlates inversely with its informational content. When everything is easy, nothing is meaningful. I think it’s worth considering if we treated our engagement patterns as a conscious design choices rather than inherited behavior from platforms optimized for addiction? Thoughts