He's awful but most of the bitcoiners that I know that voted for him were very focused on the promise to free Ross (which - props where due - he did) and were also aware of how disastrous a Kamala Harris administration would be So: horrible fiat admin and maybe Ross freed vs horrible fiat admin and very likely a crippling chokepoint 3.0 🤷‍♀️

they were never trully bitcoiners. bitcoiners are bitcoiners first

I voted for him and don’t regret it because Harris would’ve been unfathomably terrible.

Care to explain how?

Trump is a nefarious salesman. He used the ignorance of others to gain his presidency. How many don’t even know how tariffs work? 😂 We are an ignorant country run by idiots. It is what it is. Opting out was the best choice. Most didn’t vote for Satoshi Nakamoto. Me don’t care who is offended. The cognitive dissonance is REAL. 😜 Public reporting indicates Trump-family crypto ventures realized ~$800M+ in cash income, while any additional Bitcoin gains or losses remain unverifiable because holdings, purchase prices, and sales are not publicly disclosed. Guess his family is having a blast 💥

# Strategic reserve President Donald J. Trump fulfilled his promise by signing an executive order on March 6, 2025, to establish the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and a U.S. Digital Asset Stockpile^1,2,6,8. The reserve is capitalized with approximately 200,000 Bitcoin already owned by the U.S. government, which were seized through criminal or civil asset forfeiture proceedings and are valued at around $17-18 billion^1,2,3^. The order mandates a comprehensive accounting of federal digital asset holdings and prohibits the sale of Bitcoin from the reserve, positioning it as a permanent store of value^9. Additionally, the Digital Asset Stockpile is intended to include other cryptocurrencies like Ethereum, XRP, Solana, and Cardano, as specified by Trump^3,4^. The BITCOIN Act, related to this initiative, proposes allowing the Treasury to acquire up to 5% of the total Bitcoin supply, potentially worth around $88 billion, to mirror the scope of U.S. gold reserves^3^. Legislation has also been introduce # Epstein allegations Based on the recently released Department of Justice files, there are documents that contain allegations and references connecting Donald Trump to Jeffrey Epstein, but no evidence has been presented that he was criminally involved in Epstein's child exploitation ring # Peacemaking activities Based on the provided information, President Trump has been involved in mediation and ceasefire efforts in at least six different conflicts during his second term in 2025. However, the success and permanence of these agreements vary, and some claims are disputed by the involved parties. Here is a breakdown of the conflicts where Trump's administration has played a mediating role: Confirmed Mediation and Ceasefires: Israel-Gaza Conflict: The U.S. mediated a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, which was part of a broader 20-point peace plan . This effort was further solidified when the UN Security Council approved a U.S.-drafted resolution supporting the plan in November 2025 . Cambodia-Thailand Border Conflict: Following months of border clashes, Trump helped mediate a ceasefire between Cambodia and Thailand on the sidelines of an ASEAN summit in October 2025 . A joint statement from the leaders credited Trump for urging them to find a peaceful solution . Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)-Rwanda: Trump's diplomacy revived talks between the DRC and Rwanda • . A ceasefire was reached in June 2025 after what Trump described as a "long night" of talks mediated by the U.S. . However, a previous long-term ceasefire had collapsed in late 2024, highlighting the fragility of the situation8. Engagement and Mediation Efforts: Sudan: The Trump administration injected "new momentum" into mediation efforts in Sudan's ongoing civil war . While a final resolution has not been reported, the U.S. is actively involved in trying to stop the fighting. Armenia-Azerbaijan: Trump brokered a ceasefire in this conflict, according to one source, though details are sparse compared to other efforts . Russia-Ukraine War: Trump has engaged in direct talks with Vladimir Putin on the conflict^3,5^. His rhetoric initially raised public optimism for peace in Russia, but hopes have since receded as the war continues, and it remains a major unresolved conflict^5^^. Disputed or Refuted Claims: India-Pakistan: Trump's team cited mediation between India and Pakistan as a success8. However, India's External Affairs Minister publicly rejected the idea of third-party mediation and stated no foreign leader asked India to halt its operations . Serbia-Kosovo and Egypt-Ethiopia: These were also listed by Trump's team as examples of his diplomacy, but the search results do not provide further details on the U.S. role in these specific situations . In summary, experts cited in the search results credit Trump with a significant role in mediating ceasefires in at least four conflicts: Israel-Gaza, Cambodia-Thailand, DRC-Rwanda, and Armenia-Azerbaijan^2^. His administration is also actively engaged in mediation for Sudan and the Russia-Ukraine war, though the latter remains unresolved^4,5^^. --- and you @Cyph3rp9nk, what have you done for the world lately besides bitching on nostr?

pedo trump trying juggling tricks - venuzuala - iran - russia - taiwan - poker cards

bitcoiners are dumbest creatures in america to trust a politician before elected than blockchain

He freed Ross and its better to take a 5% chance on those things rather than a 0% chance plus worse gay race communism

Tell that to the rest of the world that is suffering because of his policies 😂

Explain in what we he was a worse alternative for the world than Kamala.

For me, they're both equally shitty, they don't solve anything, they're both statists, they take from one place to put in another. They're differentiated by small cosmetic measures such as

1. I assume you don't live in the US. Stopping the flow of illegals has had visible tangible improvements to being in public spaces and not having to whip out the problem solver (2A). It is easy to discount this when you're sitting behind a screen in some other country but it is Bukele tier. 2. I also assume you value Free Speech. The full court press Kamala and the UK had planned is stymied and likely to be crushed by conservative lawyers in the coming years. Trump makes the attack on 1A much more expensive. 3. He slowed down if not stopped the all out war on crypto 4. Whether through his failures or successes he revealed to conservatives how deep the rot goes and why they should feel no guilt at all about crossing the Rubicon. I never thought he was gonna be a panacea or fix everything but he is objectively better. Bought us more time.

You're forcing me to choose my favorite thief and murderer 🤷‍♂️. It's a matter of morality. I don't participate in the system, neither in my country nor in any other. If you like Trump, who is a pedophile, a murderer, and a thief, then go ahead, vote, and be part of the system. But don't come to me for my approval.

I made a calculated decision based on my interests and desire to avoid war. There is no "liking" here. You sound like a liberal college chick.

Not in detail, tbh. My perspective up to voting was strongly against many of the modern liberal values ≈ Kamala’s campaign. I wasn’t impressed with any of her accolades, attributes, nor ambitions. I think she would’ve been worse for Bitcoin and Ross would remain in prison. I admit “unfathomably terrible” is hyperbolic. In retrospect, Kamala’s White House likely would’ve continued to Uniparty, as the Uniparty persists now. I admit Trump and his cabinet is a massive disappointment and I was overly optimistic. Pam Bondi and Kash Patel are atrocious, to name a few. Before voting, I concluded and still feel a dynamic mix of DoJ, banker cartels, CIA, FBI, Israel, other foreign interests, and corporate cronies influence the country significantly more than any White House Admin has in recent decades.