Thank you for being the first person with the guts to address this comment.
Of course we could have explained things better - that didnt make it fake news then, and it doesnt make me admit to fake news now.
Re the chainsplit, you are right that my comment should have said „*the risk* of a hf is always a chainsplit“. Technically, as what Luke is referring to, a hf is defined by the loosening of consensus rules. We didnt mention chainsplit scenarios in our article, so Im not sure what that has to do with anything.
Im not sure what you mean by „presented scenarios not in the messages“, but I think if youre running knots not because you find it technically superior but because „luke is bitcoin‘s guardian angel“, then this may just be pointless to discuss
Enjoy being angry at the news tho
