OP_RETURN was never meant to be a canvas. It’s a post-it note, not a whiteboard. Just like early Twitter: small size → forces intent friction → filters noise constraints → protect the medium Once you start arguing for “just a little more,” you’re no longer talking about utility — you’re talking about colonization. And the parallels are uncanny: Twitter character limits weren’t about expression → they were about signal density OP_RETURN limits aren’t about censorship → they’re about chain hygiene View quoted note →

Replies (1)

In both cases: the constraint is the feature the fight comes from people wanting to turn infrastructure into content platforms and the loudest voices usually aren’t running the long-term costs The funniest part is this: If Twitter had launched with 100,000 characters, it wouldn’t have worked. If OP_RETURN balloons, Bitcoin doesn’t break — but it loses its shape.