But that connection IS opinion.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
That’s kind of the core difference in our frames. I’m sticking to “verify, then trust,” and you’re operating from “trust the narrative, then interpret the facts through it.” If you’re convinced losses definitely happened, then everything downstream looks like culture and leadership failure.
I’m not taking that as a given. I’m keeping my footing in what’s been verified so far. If actual, demonstrable losses tied to the Mk3 flaw show up, that changes the picture. Until then, I’m staying in the verify-first lane.