Replies (1)

Hmm I still don’t see why it is rational. I am hung up why anyone believes that decoherence can be solved from the centralization of a singular computer and a single observer. Their reliance on external classical timing systems or unitary operations force implicit bias into the system; an external deterministic schedule into a fundamentally probabilistic system. Additionally they require an artificial environment and error correction codes creating abstraction layers. You are only interacting with a simulated ideal; “don’t worry about the noise, just trust our error correction” is what it sounds like to me. What am I missing? Why is this a threat? It seems more about convincing people the threat is real rather than any demonstrated proof. Fear is the biggest motivator of action. 🤷‍♂️