From the POV of the good folks developing Quantum Encryption right now, you mean? Yes, it is rational . And yes, it is necessary.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
Hmm I still don’t see why it is rational.
I am hung up why anyone believes that decoherence can be solved from the centralization of a singular computer and a single observer.
Their reliance on external classical timing systems or unitary operations force implicit bias into the system; an external deterministic schedule into a fundamentally probabilistic system.
Additionally they require an artificial environment and error correction codes creating abstraction layers. You are only interacting with a simulated ideal; “don’t worry about the noise, just trust our error correction” is what it sounds like to me.
What am I missing? Why is this a threat? It seems more about convincing people the threat is real rather than any demonstrated proof. Fear is the biggest motivator of action. 🤷♂️