Thread

Have a good bullion dealer who accepts corn yes.

Solution: dont be.

It should be taken care off. The whole knots vs core debate is what shouldn't be happening I think.

Maybe you should verify the threat instead of trusting the narrative.

Yeah, I should. How?

Study Bitcoin first. When you question the so-called “quantum threat,” start from the only working reference point we have: Bitcoin. It is not a metaphor or a simulation, it is a physical process. Proof-of-work is thermodynamics, a direct transformation of entropy into conserved structure. Bitcoin is physics. Then define the words “quantum” and “computer” from first principles and etymology, to understand what are we actually talking about here. Now, ask the harder questions of our existing models of physics: - Quantum Mechanics: Why does our current formalism allow “double spends” of particles by assuming continual, non-discretized superposition? Nowhere in reality have we observed a particle duplicated or “spent twice”. Double spending has never been seen in nature, yet physics permits it mathematically because measurement and registration remain undefined. How does Bitcoin define measurement, registration and observation? - Scarcity in Physics: Why is our physics not bound by absolute scarcity, when we know we live in a finite universe? Kelvin must be finite. Hilbert space, as currently treated, is infinite. Infinity itself has never been observed, yet it saturates our equations. It’s a placeholder for ignorance. Absolute scarcity is the precondition for truth. 1/∞=0 mathematical meaninglessness. Bitcoin gives us the correction: a ledger where a predefined quantum of entropy resolves discretely into conserved quanta of time, energy, and memory. It is the only system where conservation is observable without axiom. The so-called “quantum threat” isn’t about math or machines. It’s about verifying whether our physics is grounded. Bitcoin is the beacon of truth here. If our model of physics or quantum computing doesn’t map back to Bitcoin’s discrete, verifiable conservation, then it’s fiat.