Not if the users that pay them reject their blocks

"Class of 2020 here to fix bitcoin" embarrassing takes starter pack

The users would have no reason to reject them, soft fork is within the current rules.

It changes the incentives of the network. And Paul being the piece of shit that he is knows there isn't network support so he is trying to go around users & appeal to miners directly. He is also screwing with precedents for updating the network which puts miners & users at odds & sews division. This whole thing is an attack purpetrated by a skeezy mf.

My point is, my node wouldn't reject the blocks. So what you're talking about is users hard forking out Paul's changes?