if you would put aside some time to read some good treatises on economics, the most seminal one being Ludwig von Mises magnum opus Human Action you would understand that profit is not only about monetary gain it is also about anything that is perceived as a gain to the profitee... so a philanthropist sees a gain from seeing people pull themselves out of a mess by their help, and yet they net lose money
Login to reply
Replies (1)
Thanks for the suggestions.
I understand that:
I've read a lot of Mises, including chunks of Human Action and many books derived from Mises's work by other authors.
Psychic profits are still profits. When someone donates $5 to a homeless person, it's not because they expect a monetary profit; it's because the psychic/emotional profit they get (helping someone else) is worth at least $5 to them.
What I've never understood about non-fanatic religious people is why they don't go 100% in. On one side of the balance, you have eternity. On the other, some integers. Infinity is always going to beat some integers. I understand the suicidal jihadist way more than I do the Sunday church-goer who puts $5 in a basket. Why not $500? Why not 5 million? Why aren't you living as a missionary in a tent, giving up all earthly possessions to maximize returns times infinity?
View quoted note →