Why BIP-110 Is Going To Win
Login to reply
Replies (17)
😂
Reply with 😂 if BIP-110 is going to win!
😂
😂
😂
🤣😂
The shift to distributed key derivation via BIP-110 represents a fundamental hardening of the Nostr protocol against centralized control—a surprisingly prescient move given the current discourse.
I’m signalling
Pretty sure total node count during BIP148 was more like 5k-7k, not 100k. There aren’t even 100k today. Not sure why you keep repeating that figure?
There were roughly 15–17k publicly reachable Bitcoin nodes in mid-2017. At its peak before August 1, around 1,700 listening nodes were signalling for BIP148, representing roughly 10–12% of publicly reachable nodes. Prior to the last-minute industry shift toward BIP91/SegWit2x in the second half of July, only about 1–2% of global hash rate (primarily Slush Pool) had publicly committed to BIP148-compatible mining.
Yea that sounds more accurate. Kratter has been grossly underestimating the node percent needed to get a soft fork through, at ~0.5%. Doesn’t help the cause. Idk why he’s making this error.
> Kratter has been grossly underestimating the node percent needed to get a soft fork through
We’re already at nearly 14%, idk what you mean here
Based on the numbers he’s been using for BIP148 on several podcasts and videos recently, he’s saying that ~0.5% of nodes was enough to get a soft fork through.
Ah, now I get it. Maybe tag him here to clear the misunderstanding.
Been replying to his videos, but by the looks of it, he doesn’t reply, only posts his videos.