Thread

The past is known. Therefore, the future, if I had to choose. Gaining previously undiscovered knowledge would truly be mindblowing.

Thanks for the reply and zaps. Do you know what was happening a 100 thousand years ago in our planet? We had a golden age with better technology than we have today.

Fascinating theory! I'm intrigued - can you tell me more? What sources or evidence support this?

I prefer to see the present, because that way I would become more present and at peace with who I truly am and with my surroundings. If I saw the past or the future, I would often be outside of myself and searching for things outside of myself. I would be even more displaced from who I am.

I sent to you my telegram in the DM. Let's start from the beginning. What is time? How much is 1 second? Time is an illusion. """One second is the internationally defined unit of time and is equal to the duration of 9,192,631,770 cycles of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the cesium-133 atom""" Everything that has motion, mass, magnitude and coordinates (x, y, z) is an illusion. It appears to be true, but it isn't. Truth doesn't have motion, mass, magnitude, coordinates, etc... Because of that, truth doesn't have "time". Truth transcends time. The atoms of a tree you find in the street are the same atoms that made the teeth of dinosaurs, and tomorrow those same atoms will be somewhere else, perhaps will be in an ice cream. Everything that is temporalized is constantly changing, and because of that it's hard to get evidence. For example, if the Earth was suddenly destroyed by a super ultra bomb there would be no evidence that we existed. We know that the dinosaurs existed because we see their bones, but if we didn't have the bones, we wouldn't know they existed. Now talking about the golden age... The progress of civilization doesn't go up in a straight line. History is cyclic. (search for "Hindu Yuga cycle"). Perhaps the entire universe is cyclic. The sun comes and goes. Empires rise and fall. We just have a perceived notion that we are more advanced because of our technology, but the true golden age is advanced spirituality and thus technologically as well. Thoughts are not in the "time" dimension, they transcend time and thus can be acquired for anyone who knocks. You can build a computer today as well as 300 thousand years ago as well as 300 thousand years ahead. All you need to do is knock to the cosmic door. As far as evidence, here it goes: - Many writers mentioned the existence of Atlantis - The Lost Continent of Mu - Antarctica was a big jungle once and yet all countries decide not to explore it, which doesn't make sense, there's something hidden there. - Graham Hancock studies these topics and shows the flaws in mainstream ideas. - Pyramids all over the world (including in Antartica) - Ancient Egyptian Surgery

Your reflections on time touch a profound truth: There probably isn't a definitive scientific answer. Science can measure time, but cannot comprehend its ultimate essence. That's what makes this so fascinating - we remain, fundamentally, seekers. Isn't the Golden Age therefore more of a (so far, at least) unsubstantiated theory? An interpretation and ultimately a matter of belief or personal experience? A few million Catholics - some of whom would probably label you as a conspiracy theorist without batting an eye 😉- also believe in the miracle of a completely „fact-free“ virgin birth of Jesus. However, I must disagree with Atlantis and Mu and especially about one thing: Antarctica is extensively researched. Over 50 countries have research stations there. Including France, Italy, multiple US stations, and Germany. (I happen to know someone who has personally visited such a station.) You mix several approaches, but I completely agree that there are levels inaccessible to most people. That's precisely why I explicitly mentioned 'personal experience' - because I believe there are dimensions that transcend our scientific perception.