For the "safety of kids", some bitcoiners are fine with censorship as long as it virtue signals their perceived moral superiority to the ever listening algorithms. Looks to me like someone is pushing a narrative and social media "influencers" are happy to carry the baton into the corners of the bothered bitcoiners.
Deliberate attack on Core? Hidden agenda? Go figure.
Login to reply
Replies (6)
Only financial transactions, and possibly the
Bitcoin equivalent of smart contracts, belong on Bitcoin mainnet (layer 1).
What does @Matthew Kratter stand to gain by not wanting the proposed changes?
Op return has exited in core since like 2015. What you are saying is dumb or you claim Bitcoin has been censored since then and only now will be uncensored ๐?
Thank you for proving my point.
Possible gain? How can we know.. either virtue signaling or a case of 'I know how to fix Bitcoin'. But might also be something entirely different.
Do you support putting child porn on the blockchain?
This argument was not even about "safety of kids" until all of you people made it about that.
Like bro what the fuck?
We were arguing about spam and now y'all want to use the blockchain for hosting CP
What the fuck