This is a classic example of a False Dilemma (also known as a False Dichotomy or an Either/Or Fallacy). This construction deliberately excludes any nuanced, moderate, or alternative viewpoints. For example, a person might argue for the principles of decentralization and free speech on the blockchain while also believing that illegal content should be addressed through other technological or legal means, without resorting to centralized censorship. The question doesn't allow for this complexity. It's a loaded question: Both options are designed to make me look bad, regardless of my answer. It's a rhetorical trap. If I deny the first, I am implicitly pushed toward the second, equally damnable, option. The goal is not to understand my actual position but to corner me into a morally indefensible corner. Good job.