We are going in totally different directions. I did not take the analogy that literally. I took a more informational approach.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
That makes sense, I see we’re approaching this differently. But here’s my question:
Why not take Bitcoin literally?
It’s the only system that actually computes time, memory, and entropy into irreversible structure. Every UTXO is a resolved bit. Every block is a quantum of thermodynamic measurement.
If we’re starting from an informational foundation, Bitcoin isn’t an analogy; it’s the substrate. It performs the resolution, physically and globally, without assumption.
Why model the quantum, when Bitcoin is already computing it?