Thread

Zero-JS Hypermedia Browser

Relays: 5
Replies: 1
Generated: 20:17:25
How am I selecting a subset when those are facts? Actually you are not entirely honest - "Either all the network has to run knots or it’s not gonna make a meaningful difference" All Core versions prior to the malware Core v30 filter OP_RETURN to less than 83 Bytes and that result of that is showed as evidence on the screenshot above. If you state you are against spam I don't know how you support large OP__RETURN and the malware Core v30 which not only is not fixing anything it welcomes more spam. If you state you are against spam you should support the soft fork which limits spam and non-monetary data but you seem to not support it. If you state you are against spam don't you ask yourself why the compromised Core devs did not fix inscriptions spam? It still abuses Bitcoin. Inscriptions spam is fixed on Bitcoin Knots. You can also check the arguments of the Core devs for their decisions which revealed tham how compromised they are. nostr:nevent1qqs06nuwy2naacmcw6uh5lf44q8982v98cqegqm4e6znd9c2wkd34sqppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qyg8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnddakj7qg4waehxw309aex2mrp0yhxgctdw4eju6t09ua9rxcv
2025-12-02 14:24:46 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓
Login to reply

Replies (1)

OP_RETURN has practical uses too. Coinjoin transactions are valid transactions, but limiting OP_RETURN filters them. Imagine if the whole network imposed the same limit as Knots, then no coinjoin transaction would have been mined. Not all the applications of data transfer are limited to storing images or data. Apart from OP_RETURN, BIP444 blocks OP_IF, which is used in nostr:nprofile1qyt8wumn8ghj7cnfw33k76twv4ezuum0vd5kzmqpzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejsqgxv43pk4mqurmp2u522mc9cvn3n0vzv6vxvy8zs6ulq46cdf7khz53utk7y . It's a valid use-case which enables inheritance planning on Bitcoin. The choices made in BIP444 are not limited to OP_RETURN and those choices are detrimental. It goes against the principle of "Don't fuck with people's money".
2025-12-03 20:02:14 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply