I think I'm on the side of reason. Also it's not just a one-dimensional thing. There's a whole bag of considerations with switching to BIP110 and spam vs. no-spam is not even up for votes. BIP110 doesn't stop or reduce spam just as Core30 didn't enable or augment spam as any chart tracking those metrics can show you. With that, "shitcoins on Bitcoin" is equally not affected by this change in relay policy and won't by BIP110. Corruption in Core: I don't vote on the people behind the implementations. Bitcoin is an open protocol and while Core has a lot of influence, Core can't force any bad change at will. I'm curious to learn about Adam Back's Epstein connection but again, it does not reflect on what software is good or bad. Saylor is questionable and always was. So what? Just because Faketoshi attacks Bip110 doesn't mean it must be good. Faketoshi is a bad actor but let's not further inflate his ego. He doesn't know how things work. His judgement is irrelevant.