If the goal was to prove that people will build outside the status quo, Nostr succeeded.
But if the goal is to create a scalable, censorship-resistant web that normal people can rely on, then it hasn’t even begun to meet that bar.
What I’m pointing out isn’t that Nostr shouldn’t exist. It’s that its design inherently caps its scalability and censorship resistance. The same loose structure that makes it "easy" to build on also makes it impossible to coordinate, enforce quality, or provide credible exits.
Success measured by enthusiasm is one thing. Success measured by capability is another.
Login to reply
Replies (2)
“What I’m pointing out isn’t that Nostr shouldn’t exist. It’s that its design inherently caps its scalability and censorship resistance. The same loose structure that makes it "easy" to build on also makes it impossible to coordinate, enforce quality, or provide credible exits.”
Is @Big Bad John correct?
View quoted note →
Yeah I am not interested in lieing to myself, with hopium, but rather building something of value, on something of value, that I can call my own
Platform risk is something that really pissed me off the last 5 years