fiatjaf's avatar
fiatjaf _@fiatjaf.com 2 months ago
See, @arthurfranca, there is real supply of infrastructure for hosting files, and it's -~=FREE=~- for up to HUNDREDS of 44b apps per user! Meanwhile relays don't want to store base93-encoded unreadable blobs. Sure, they may accept it for now, but that's only because it's too much hassle for them to try to fight it, not because it's something they want. It's a flawed approach to try to build against all the incentives and still hope you'll get something that will last for the long term. Make
44billion
One login, many apps
 blossom again!
↑ Parent

Replies (3)

arthurfranca's avatar
arthurfranca 2 months ago
"Make 44billion.net blossom again!" Ima make 44billion.net closed again instead =/ Sorry I'm disappointed. Just saw @OpenSats email rejecting the project. After 3 months of waiting they didn't bother adding any detail, just a generic email.
1 replies ↓
arthurfranca's avatar
arthurfranca 2 months ago
Though thanks for the feedback and helping me out. Regarding shakepeare apps, @Alex Gleason et al haven't show any interest yet. I will consider blossom, but yes my current understanding is that relays are free to block these events as they will. However, incentive-wise, if they do so, I may let their customers know that these paid relays are offering 1GB of storage just because the users will never use it because it will take forever to reach 1GB with only text notes.
1 replies ↓
↑