Pushing a contentious fork is gambling. Moreover, not only at your own cost, but at the cost of bitcoin users.
Login to reply
Replies (3)
Fork would be unnecessary if contentious changes weren't made to core including the inscriptions bug which was redefined as a feature, rather than admitting it's a bug and patching. Probably because some of the devs were profiting off the shitcoinery that is inscriptions. Bitcoin is an electronic cash system NOT electronic trash system. You want NFTs, you're an ETH head shitcoiner. ๐คก
That's all irrelevant in the context of the offer to swap sats between the chains. I despise NFTs, ETH and #BLV
Segwit was contentious too. Miners and Core were against it. We got lightning out of it.