Yes.
I think Saylor has learned that speaking about specifics puts you in a world of hurt, but speaking in analogies, you can't lose an argument.
Probably corporate culture and politics also hurts your ability to criticise things directly because HR will call you mean as if you were targeting an individual directly even if you never mentioned the person at all, just their ideas/products.
Anyway, I think this is why I struggle so much to understand him or why so many people think he is so informative. Maybe it's like taro readers, people hear what they want to hear and applaud while I'm genuinely trying to figure out his point other than the fact that he appears to know a lot about things I don't.
Replies (2)
I mean, it's interesting to learn that some people can't store fat and will starve if they don't eat where most of us would just be hungry, but what does it have to do with bitcoin?
The fact is, there is currently a billionaire with dictatorial control over a publicly traded company, who happens to love acquiring bitcoin.
One whose base (albeit convoluted) argument is for conservative updates to the base layer.
There’s certainly a lot to pick a part and argue there. But at some point soon, a billionaire with dictatorial control over a massive public/private company will start publicly stacking and evangelizing bitcoin.
Only this time, their base argument (however convoluted) will be for radical updates to the base layer.
Gird thy nodes plebs.
