Unless of course the mere existence of full blocks offends you. We should definitely work on making sure nobody uses bitcoin at all to keep the chain smaller. BCH proved us all wrong this way by having a chain 1/3 our size...

Replies (1)

bch has adjustable blocks like monero which i think is a way better model for onchain fees since bitcoin was always supposed to bee about millions of people using it as p2p cash and fees eventually replacing the diminishing block reward, and in monero's case we have a tail emission so miners arent even dependent on fees, and also helps with velocity of money as opposed to a finite 21 million which encourages hoarding and discourages uses as p2p cash, basically nobody really uses btc, and custodial zaps of 21 sats don't count. The only time bitcoin ever ssees any meanigful onchain use is with things like ordinals when the throttled epstein developers refuse to increase blocksize with demand like satoshi instructed. the wet dream bitcoiners haave that somehow nation states will use btc for settlement and pay hundreds of thousands of dollars for a transaction is completely retarded. anything producing L1 fees for miners should be prioritized in everyway before they decidde attacking the chain is more profitable or just abaandon btc and pivot to ai. it's a permissionless netwoprk, being a faggot about how people try to permissionlessly use it is gay and retarded.