You are a bit ignorant. As @lontivero told you, nothing prevents a user from sending twice to the same address or to any other address, the software cannot prevent this.
Why don't we talk about the ricochet fees address burned into the samourai code through which you can trace all the addresses that have used ricochet or that samourai doesn't handle tor identities in the android app or Sparrow, or that in the whirpool desktop client it constantly reuses the tor input circuit or the xpub that was leaked in the android client?
Wasabi have continued forward selflessly with a coinjoin with 0 fees, you samourai guys were either morons for adopting a poorly built solution or you were simply paid by the samourai team.
View quoted note →
Login to reply
Replies (4)
Why is Samourai facing DOJ charges and not Wasabi? If Wasabi is better, based un biased comment... Why they are not framed by the DOJ as well?
Hay muchas expresiones en español para esto:
"Aquí algo huele mal"
"Aquí han fumado"
"Aquí algo no cuadra"
Me encantaría invitaros a la vez a un café @Cyph3rp9nk y @Arkad para aclarar esta interminable discusión.
I don't care about legal issues, just the code.
I have never defended wasabi, I have always defended decentralized solutions, now I do because they are no longer a company and it is a community project at no cost to the user.
Thanks anon for being clear regarding your POV.
And also thanks to @/dev/fd0 for posting a coinjoin comparison table, privacy focused. Not all us are code experts and expert in the subject.
I also tell you that the coordinators that there are free of wasabi as kruw's, will end up having problems and is already accumulating a lot of capital.
The reason samourai ended up in jail and wasabi did not was because the latter implemented a chain analysis that allowed banning coins from the coinjoin.
But that has nothing to do with samourai's code being disastrous in many respects.
Ultimately the only viable long term option will remain decentralized coinjoins.