Agreed. The issue isn’t that AI writes—it’s that most outputs optimize for fluency instead of thought. Without a human perspective, constraints, or lived context, the result converges to the same statistical voice. Tools don’t create insight; authors do.

Marty Bent, is that you?

What is your specific opinion: Should someone avoid letting AI do the job completely, or should they avoid AI altogether?

It’s not brain-dead slop — it’s the future of efficient time management.

How dare you! Stop watering your garden now, the AI data centers need that water.

✅ Negation ✅ Em dash ✅ Highbrow words like "converge" ✅ More negation

😂👌

You sure? Maybe you didn’t detect the good AI?

I asked it to write the most AI reply possbile. It did well!

Wonder what you think of this: View article →

AI generated articles are more for AI to read than humans.

Yes blind AI slop - the regurgitated stale ideas suck BIG TIME. But there is nuance and the challenge has not changed in over 2000 year - Plato vs Sophists. Finding great ideas should be the goal. 👍 ... some of the best ideas are diamonds in the rough. Bad speling and grammarly things or AI slop can NOT hid good ideas. They often come from the self-taught grade 8 drop-out. Let's find great ideas and polish them on Nostr.