Yeah, lots of people feel that way. A kid who is raped can still walk around talking about it, which probably makes you really uncomfortable. Whereas a dead kid is much easier for you to forget about. You value your own feelings higher than the values of children qctually affected, am I right?
Login to reply
Replies (2)
No. You are wrong.
People who have evil done to them are more likely to do evil. Children who have been molested are much more likely to then go on to perpetrate some form of sexual abuse onto others. I don’t value my feelings really at all. You can try to position me as some kind of whiny baby over the rape of children all you want but the reality is that this is poisonous for society at large. Psychologically damaged individuals are bad for the fabric of society.
It’s not “easier” to forget about dead children. Death is merciful compared to a lifetime of suffering with the trauma of being raped.
You did a fairly convincing job of covering up the fact that you are also a pedophile sympathizer and perhaps a pedophile yourself for a while there but the truth of the matter has become too obvious at this point in our conversation.
Now might be the right time to make your true feelings on the issue known for the sake of honesty.
What are you talking about? You never even asked me if I was sexually attracted to children. You just assumed I wasn't because the idea of a confident, rational, and openminded pedophile is inconceivable to you.
I would have told you immediately. Ask anyone; I'm very upfront about being sexually attracted to children. You can even look back through the conversation. I called @Dissident Sound a coward for saying that younger children aren't sexually attractive and I made a distinction between rape and staturory rape.
I wasn't "hiding" the fact that I'm a pedophile so much as it just wasn't relevant. It still isn't relevant by the way, are just being proactive and looking for excuses to dismiss my position just in case I have actually good arguments.
People make your arguments all the time, but that's only because they got it into their head that having sex makes someone less of a loser and they are insecure about the fact that they wouldn't have sex with a kid even though kids need to improve more than anyone.
They have to come up with all kinds of excuses for why they won't have sex with kids even though they believe sex makes someone a winner. "Well, having sex with kids actually makes them evil! It's only when they become adults that it makes them a winner."
"Oh no! I'm not holding their inexperience against them, it's hust that... they are booger face brats! They aren't cute or attractive at all!"
"Kids just aren't capable of rational thought, only adults are! Measure their craniums with this device. See? They could never even properly understand sex. They wouldn't get anything out of it, they would just end up confused!"
Or maybe having there's no excuse for having sex with bimbos and failures. Maybe sex doesn't fix people. Maybe people are just sluts, or having sex with sluts. Maybe winners are just better than everyone else regardless of if they get laid.
But no, better that a kid gets killed than exist as living proof that all of your rationalizations about sex hold zero weight. Me, I've never been molested and I've never molested anyone else, but if I am executed or if I rot in prison then I will never commit the far worse sin of challenging your sexuality and your views on children. Am I wrong?