π‘ Poll: Whatβs your thoughts on subscriptions like Damus Purple? β Funding open-source development in return for some in-app features and goodies. (perhaps more: extra NIP-96 and Blossom storage, dedicated NIP-59 first-class citizen relays, etc).
Good model? If not, why so?
#nostr #asknostr #freedom #poll
Login to reply
Replies (14)
#nostr should be so decentralized, nobody needs to pay for any network functions
Subscription models detract from that goal
No business model can fix how the world kinda sucks as long as people are too shitty to willingly stop filing taxes and send that money to open source developers instead
How do you propose devs continue to build said software/services in reality? A donation-only scheme? Curious.
To be clear, I agree on full decentralisation as well (open-source infra + clients), not a fan of βclosed-gardenβ Nostr apps, completely against the principle. π€£
You're not making sense. What's stopping devs from continuing to build things that you're asking me for a solution to here? And if a donation-only scheme solves it then why are you asking me? What's your actual question?
Changing the definition of "troll" to mean "anyone people don't like" is fucking retarded
You're a troll because you talk bullshit to fuck with people
I'm not a troll because I don't
That's how the word "troll" is supposed to work
Well do talk more bullshit than the rest of nostr
I speak truth on nostr
damus opted for double ratchet so I understood yesterday, so no giftwrap nip-59.
Nostr clients are moving more and more towards the freemium model
Developing a client requires at least two developers, who at least want to cover some costs
Really glad to see Double-Ratchet gaining support recently. π₯
or is it a grant from Opensats π


OpenSats
Eleventh Wave of Nostr Grants
OpenSats is funding five more open-source projects advancing the nostr ecosystem.
I bet you believe it being truth, thatβs definition of delusion
No, that's not the definition of delusion
A delusion is a fixed belief that is not amenable to change in light of conflicting evidence
There you go π―
π«‘