The attack on Saylor seems very coordinated & centralized for such a decentralized protocol like BTC. 🧐🧐🧐🧐 Mallers tossing in his 2cents now. All of this is such a net positive as it shows how early we still are and that we’re really living through the infantile stage of growth. Bullies piling on in the schoolyard.

Replies (37)

Remember when a bunch of people recently started bad mouthing Wallet of Satoshi because it was custodial and they said it would do shotgun kyc on everyone, and then suddenly launched their own custodial wallet with kyc instead? Surely no ulterior motives this time though.
I wait for my enemies on the side of the river. They always float by eventually. And I usually just poke their body with a sharp stick for fun as they do.
Michael Saylor has done more for my worldview and wealth than all these more minor bros put together. Saylor is focused on institutional adoption of Bitcoin these days and will possibly become the wealthiest person on earth. I’m watching him.
Pomp will chime in soon on this as well. Then you know it’s legit. Was Mallers wearing a baby bonnet in that video as well? So weird.
Fanbois unite. Saylor means nothing to me personally. I just call out lairs when they lie. Odell is stirring a pot just to do it. And it also benefits him. Jack & Jack confuse me a bit. Cathie Wood offers a competitive product to Saylors stock. She’s also a vindictive bitch so there’s something there for sure. None of these characters can be trusted. They’ve lost my respect.
👀 Mallers seemed pretty emotional as well. I was waiting for soft music & maybe a few tears. “Please support the homeless & puppies”.
I said the same thing the day he started this FUD. Fuckin clown now.
rand0mguest2's avatar
rand0mguest2 1 year ago
I don’t think he actually believes that he’s just catering to the ops . Either way Saylor is right lol
He announced the upcoming stock sales clearly in January and said he would use the proceeds to buy Bitcoin and for personal obligations.
Like @DarthCoin ₿⚡️, I’ve been posting my scepticism of Saylor long before Odell posted his note about Dev funding. I don’t know either of them, have had few interactions with them on #nostr (you can login with my npub to verify) and nowhere else. I’m not coordinating with anyone, it doesn’t seem like anyone else is to me either. Some of us are just wired different to you. We think adversarially. We think about incentives. And our bullshit detectors don’t have off switches. This is good for #Bitcoin. Saylor has simply been piling up a list of non-Bitcoiner things said of late and is being called out for it.
It’s almost like your bs detector was working last year too!!!! Wow!
Ok sure Jan. A monkey throwing shit against the wall isn’t a bullshit detector. It’s a monkey tossing shit. Saylor scares you. It’s fine. Just admit it. He’s a scary dude. So shit in your hand & start throwing. Here’s my bullshit detector. You’re full of shit.
Do you get paid in BTC? How do you pay your bills currently? Do you own any stocks or a 401K? Do you spend cash money for daily livin? Answer any of these simple questions the wrong way and you too are a Fiat maxi Darth. You too. Shocking right.
This is why part of me thinks drive chains might be a great idea, actually. It will make it cheaper and faster to create LN channels off main-chain without too drastically changing the way the rest of the network operates. Currently, we can't on-board millions of new people per day, as we will inevitably do if Bitcoin is to be something the average person uses daily. We want a world without huge custodians, which would be better than what we have but still not quite the goal. With Drive Chains, the 256 side chains could operate more quickly and with larger block sizes, which can get purged when synced with main regularly, allowing for a strong scaling effect. It's still decentralized too, as opposed to other "side chains" or custodians.
BoomTown's avatar
BoomTown 1 year ago
At worst it’s locked up forever. At best, they can’t keep it without continued work. Any action they take towards it legitimizes it over the long run. Also, Bitcoin is for enemies.
Maybe, it's definitely in the realm of possibilities. It could also be that one person said something, then the next one called them to discuss, and it spread quickly like anything like that would in a small circle. They all know each other and probably talk within their "influencer" circle often. Things can spread fast.