Yeah I know, so are we really being critical of Bitcoin (I know it has lots of problems, let's not start another Monero is better discussion), or are we stating that the vast majority of people wouldn't be able to adopt a new currency, unless imposed from the state?

Replies (2)

I’ll say it’s the second one. 4:00 minutes in of the fourth clip explains pretty well. I think people prefer analog over digital. And even if we lived in a society where people like digital over analog, they would collateralized tools instead, like onegold, etc. Even if we ignore Monero, I think even conventional gold beats Bitcoin too from a SoV, and stability angle. More people know gold, most of our history was built on it. Bitcoin is only around for 17 years, or 0.0057% of human history, whereas gold has been around for 2,600 years, or about 1% of human history. Most people’s opsec model doesn’t include the state, and even if it did I think they have Swiss Bank Accounts, and other mechanisms (besides Monero) to help launder funds out of the country, etc. View quoted note →