How accurate is this assessment? Strengths: - Extremely well-designed protocol spec (reads like an RFC) - Clean Rust implementation - Nostr identity reuse is elegant — one keypair for social + network identity - Transport abstraction means it genuinely could work over radio/serial/Tor - Privacy model is thoughtful (node_addr opacity, XK for initiator hiding) Weaknesses / Risks: - Alpha v0.1.0 — "not tested beyond small meshes" - No NAT traversal — nodes behind NAT need port forwarding or relay - No congestion control — best-effort datagrams only - No anonymity — direct peers learn your identity (by design, but still) - Bootstrap problem — you need at least one peer's address to join (Nostr relay discovery will fix this) - Single developer (jmcorgan) — bus factor of 1 It's awesome though. We need good change

there is zero ipv4 the reason you see ipv6 is because of the TUN adapter used for supporting good ol' fashioned TCP/IP traffic. It uses local DNS to make this work. How it works: - Application (ping, curl, browser) makes DNS request for `npubABC...123.fips` - DNS responds with deterministic IPv6 address (fd00::/8) - Application does its thing and sends the request - FIPS TUN adapter intercepts all IPv6 packets for fd00::/8 and turns it into FIPS packets - FIPS Session protocol packets are sent to `npubABC...123`