OK. After I address this one, please tell me where my presentation is wrong if you have other items as you suggest. Yes. 6-7 thousand years. Well, think about it. If what I'm saying is right, then there would be very little evidence of civilization prior to about 6000 years ago, right? That happens to be the case. The aCaDeMIc "consensus" is that there were no civilizations prior to the fertile crescent in Mesopotamia, right? So that would explain why there is very little evidence of anything beyond the most recent flood, for starters. Notice I said "very little evidence" whereas you said "apparently no archaeological evidence". What about the Piri Reis map showing unglaciated coastlines of Antarctica? What about the map projection method used suggestive of highly advanced mathematics on the part of whoever created the map which is apparently at least as old as...4000 BC which would be...6000 years ago...and according to the research I presented, we are currently experiencing a geomagnetic excursion as of ~1947 when the Air Force noticed that the magnetic north pole had made a dramatic shift in position relative to the previous 114 years of relative stability on Boothia Peninsula. What about Tiahuanaco? What about Gobekli Tepe? What about the erosion on the pyramids suggesting they spent a significant amount of time underwater experiencing parabolic wave erosion patterns? What about the aurora borealis we've had recently that were visible at record southerly latitudes in the northern hemisphere and record northerly latitudes in the southern hemisphere? We have the ongoing south Atlantic anomaly. We have seen increasing volatility in terms of major weather events which would make sense given that we know the strength of the magnetosphere has is decreasing at an accelerating pace. Earth's core recently shifted and began spinning in the opposite direction. There's plenty of evidence for this. The issue is that lots of that evidence COULD be explained in other ways and many people are simply not aware of the evidence. It's there though. It explains why billionaires are building bunkers in New Zealand. It explains why they put together the international seed back in Svalbard. They know that stuff in the Arctic circle is likely to wind up in a temperate zone after the next pole flip and temperate zones are where civilization will redevelop after the next flood.

Replies (2)

Jimmy's avatar
Jimmy 7 months ago
Holy crap dude. You didn't have to write a damn book. Before I even get into addressing your comment, why not simply compose all this so-called evidence into a research paper? if you're right, collect your Nobel prize. You'd be world famous. " If what I'm saying is right..." Automatic fail by logical fallacy, you're assuming that you're right before you even begin. There's plenty of evidence of civilization prior to 6,000 years ago, cave paintings, Stone tools, skeletons found with jewelry attached, how we even know Chinese civilization had a written language at least 12,000 years ago, and they didn't write about anything resembling a worldwide flood. You do realize that a magnetic polar shift doesn't mean the Earth physically turns on its side, right? Earth's core started spinning in the other direction‽‽‽‽‽‽‽‽🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 No, it most certainly did not. "The issue is that lots of that evidence COULD be explained in other ways" You're so close, you're just so damn close right here. Understand Occam's razor my dude, when you do, you'll realize you're organizing the evidence to try and fit your fantastical conclusion. That's a mistake, you need to understand the evidence as clearly and unbiasedly as possible and draw conclusions based on that and nothing else. Also sometimes you need to be content with not knowing. Saying "I don't know" is an acceptable answer. Regarding the purpose of the seed vault, wrong again: image