I think the word retard is silly. And I think some ideas are retarded. Socialism is a retarded idea. And I used ai once... to compile evidence I knew already existed and didn't want to spend 20 minutes typing it out to someone that isn't going to care what the facts are anyways. Is the ai wrong? Or is it just information you don't want to contend with?

AI itself is OK. However, having AI make your arguments for you is wrong when you cannot argue your case on you own. You're solely able to make the basest of assertions, and then throw shit at others. It's childish, dumb and such behaviour deserves only scorn.

It didn't make any arguments for me. It cited a study. Which is what he asked for. I made the argument, it backed it with the facts. What deserves scorn is your inability to retort the facts presented and instead play this game of "well you just used ai and bad words" It's a petty character assassination and anyone that's not retarded can see through it.

No, you made crude insults and copypastaed your google ai response afterwards as if it was both an argument on its own and if its results were indisputably correct and unassailable. It was neither, in the unlikely case that you care to examine what you copypasted. Why should I spend my time typing out arguments to a person that clearly does not recognise the value of argument, or even what an argument is? You continue to accuse others of what you are yourself guilty of, and you have clearly misunderstood what a character assasination is, assuming of course that those were your words and not more ai puke. You offer nothing of value. Still solely worthy of scorn.

I have used ai exactly once in this thread. To cite the COB findings in 2019.