Peter Alexander's avatar
Peter Alexander 6 months ago
What you’ve described just isn’t how China would go about the process unless provoked. While it may seem quaint, Chinese thinking on such matters does remain very closely aligned with Sun Tzu’s hierarchy of attack. 1. Attack the enemy’s strategy 2. Attack the enemy’s alliances 3. Attack the enemy’s army 4. Attack the enemy’s cities These are in order and Sun Tzu describes the final step as being “the least desirable and most costly”. At the same time, Beijing would be adding to is overall calculus its current relative position geopolitically speaking. Agree or disagree, Beijing views both European states and America as declining powers. There is simply more to be gained by remining patient and doing nothing. I do, however, very much appreciate your comment and raising a different perspective. If nothing else, we can just appreciate having differing opinions which is totally fine.

Replies (1)

Peace K 🪙's avatar
Peace K 🪙 6 months ago
Thanks for your polite response. I am not claiming to be correct on this issue. Just to broaden my knowledge by exchanging ideas. My next question will be: will the leader of China Xi Jingpin have the humility to say "Another person can do this, and maybe even better then me". Or will he, like most dictators say "I am a giant amongst dwarfs. If I won't do this, no one will do this". I will also point out that the fact that he threw out the rule that limits his time as the head of the CCP to ten years, hints at the latter.