If a baby cries, should he override his parents? If the town retard whales, should the town beholden to him? If commie larps mime the bolshevik revolution, should Americans cease to govern themselves?

If some troons in Japan want to join the globohomo communist revolution, should the Japanese people be stripped of their country? View quoted note →

If a community of criminals is against Bukele's restoration of El Salvador, should the gangs be unleashed on the family population again? View quoted note →

Explain to me why you are right and Hoppe is wrong. View quoted note →

Why does Bukele shit on the West all the time but also wants to be part of them at the same time.

By all means. View quoted note →

Hoppe is an anarchist and doesn't believe in a national will. He certainly doesn't believe in using the power of a nation state to crush the expressed desires of a community. His point about open vs closed borders is that the state shouldn't be making this choice at all. It should be private property owners but the state prevents that. The second best, then, is the nearest approximation to what private owners would do, which is locally expressed political preferences that are often exclusionary. There's nothing in Hoppe's writing that supports an outside group invading a community and forcing a policy regime on them.

False choice. If the private property owners approve of how those "criminals" were using their private property, then Bukele should leave them all alone. If the private property owners wanted the criminals to be dealt with, then there's no problem with him rounding them up.