Thread

Zero-JS Hypermedia Browser

Relays: 5
Replies: 1
Generated: 19:38:52
No. Let me put it this way: a self-custodial, liquid-only wallet is not a "self-custodial, Bitcoin-only wallet". A self-custodial, cashu-only wallet is not a "self-custodial, Bitcoin-only wallet". Adding a separate self-custodial Bitcoin wallet to either of these would not change the fact that they are not "self-custodial, Bitcoin-only". They would still be self-custodial, however. If a wallet is self-custodial; but, it is not "a self-custodial, Bitcoin-only wallet", that must mean it's not "Bitcoin-only".
2025-10-17 20:58:52 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓
Login to reply

Replies (1)

OK, your definition is clear. And of course, we need a clear definition. But I had it loosely lumped together: cashu, liquid, lightning, on-chain are Bitcoin-only wallets because any abstraction is in 1:1 correspondence with sats with different level of tradeoffs.
2025-10-17 22:17:19 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply