If you can’t prove whether coins were moved by an owner or an attacker, then you can’t prove a “attack” ever occurred. All you’d have is a story, an unverifiable assumption under the guise of science. To change/“upgrade” Bitcoin over an unprovable threat is to abandon the very principle it was built on: don’t trust, verify.

Replies (1)

The chances these long dormant coins are being moved by a nefarious actor is very low It’s just as likely that a nefarious actor is moving recently attained coins @_Checkɱate 🔑⚡🌋☢️🛢️ does some great on-chain anlaysis looking at long-term holder behaviour And frankly it explains so well why we get sell-side pressure when the price runs People have made a amazing returns, far better than any other asset class, and it makes sense to cash some in I believe that’s what we’re seeing