If you can’t prove whether coins were moved by an owner or an attacker, then you can’t prove a “attack” ever occurred. All you’d have is a story, an unverifiable assumption under the guise of science.
To change/“upgrade” Bitcoin over an unprovable threat is to abandon the very principle it was built on: don’t trust, verify.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
The chances these long dormant coins are being moved by a nefarious actor is very low
It’s just as likely that a nefarious actor is moving recently attained coins
@_Checkɱate 🔑⚡🌋☢️🛢️ does some great on-chain anlaysis looking at long-term holder behaviour
And frankly it explains so well why we get sell-side pressure when the price runs
People have made a amazing returns, far better than any other asset class, and it makes sense to cash some in
I believe that’s what we’re seeing