I think the confusion is trying to compare different use cases, I don't think there is any scenario where anyone should recommend storing their onchain bitcoin with a custodian.
It's not so obvious in the "small amount you goof around with on nostr" case.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
I suppose having multiple options is fine so you can choose the level of trust-minimization you desire, but calling it sats instead or ecash feels wrong/posing — like bcash vibes.