And then eventually the heir happens to be some dipshit. Not that the dipshit rules. Invisible power structures (IYKYK) emerge, and the King’s “master of stool” is suddenly the most prestigious job in the Kingdom. Eventually the actual rulers want to be recognised as such, and violence ensues.
Look, there are no “good” systems. It’s a space of trade-offs where you pick your poison. Or, well, it’s only a democracy that lets you “pick” the poison.
Arguably, the only real benefit a democracy provides is non-violent transfer of power. There are “democracies” where even this is not a given, and then yeah, a monarchy would be better, as the cycle of violence is longer.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
Yep, with human nature and the ultimate competitions for resources that emerge, all systems eventually go to shit. The only question is how fast and how bloody. Our exceptionalism through history, our flourishing and our declines will always be cyclical. Never dreamed I’d be living through a fourth turning, but I’m here for it.