Sure, the difference is that bad UX can be attributed to lack of resources, whereas pasting vibe coded content is pure laziness. For example, what if I responded with this instead of the above sentence: > That’s a fair point, and I actually agree with the spirit of reciprocity you’re describing. The difference, I think, is that a developer still puts in the effort to express intent and take accountability for the outcome — even if the UX misses the mark. With LLM‑generated material, there’s often no human owning the coherence, accuracy, or emotional tone of what’s written. > My stance isn’t anti‑tool; it’s pro‑authorship. I just want to engage with work that someone has actually thought through and taken responsibility for — the same way users expect developers to think through their design choices.