The subject of the OP is an Israeli citizen making his case (propaganda) as to why the US First Amendment needs to be "limited in order to protect it" Americans would be rightly justified in perceiving this propaganda as an "attack" or "assault" on the First Amendment

Replies (1)

Stjepan's avatar
Stjepan 1 week ago
If you think that individual talking on TV is attack or assault than you have WAY bigger problems than you think you have.